| Number | Table Caption | Page | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | The low-attenuation regions of an optical fiber. | 6 | |
| 1.2 | A four-channel point-to-point WDM transmission system with amplifiers. | 10 | |
| 1.3 | A Wavelength Add/Drop Multiplexer (WADM). | 11 | |
| 1.4 | A 4 x 4 passive star. | 12 | |
| 1.5 | A 4 x 4 passive router (four wavelengths). | 12 | |
| 1.6 | A 4 x 4 active switch (four wavelengths). | 13 | |
| 1.7 | A passive-star-based local optical WDM network. | 14 | |
| 1.8 | A wavelength-routed (wide-area) optical WDM network. | 16 | |
| 1.9 | A wavelength-routed WDM network. | 22 | |
| 2.1 | The low-attenuation regions of an optical fiber. | 24 | |
| 2.2 | Single-mode and multimode optical fibers. | 26 | |
| 2.3 | Light traveling via total internal reflection within a fiber. | 27 | |
| 2.4 | Graded-index fiber. | 28 | |
| 2.5 | Numerical aperture of a fiber. | 28 | |
| 2.6 | Splitter, combiner, and coupler. | 35 | |
| 2.7 | A 16 x 16 passive-star coupler. | 36 | |
| 2.8 | The general structure of a laser. | 38 | |
| 2.9 | Structure of a semiconductor diode laser. | 39 | |
| 2.10 | Free spectral range and finesse of a tunable filter capable of tuning to N different channels. | 47 | |
| 2.11 | Cascading filters with different FSRs. | 48 | |
| 2.12 | Structure of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. | 49 | |
| 2.13 | A semiconductor optical amplifier. | 54 | |
| 2.14 | Erbium-doped fiber amplifier. | 55 | |
| 2.15 | The gain spectrum of an erbium-doped fiber amplifier with input power = - 40 dBm. | 56 | |
| 2.16 | 2 x 2 crossconnect elements in the cross state and bar state. | 58 | |
| 2.17 | Schematic of optical crosspoint elements. | 60 | |
| 2.18 | A 2 x 2 amplifier gate switch. | 62 | |
| 2.19 | A 4 x 4 nonreconfigurable wavelength router. | 63 | |
| 2.20 | The waveguide grating router (WGR). | 64 | |
| 2.21 | A P x P reconfigurable wavelength-routing switch with M wavelengths. | 67 | |
| 2.22 | The staggering switch architecture. | 68 | |
| 2.23 | The CORD architecture. | 69 | |
| 2.24 | The HLAN architecture. | 70 | |
| 2.25 | An all-optical wavelength-routed network. | 70 | |
| 2.26 | Wavelength-continuity constraint in a wavelength-routed network. | 71 | |
| 2.27 | Functionality of a wavelength converter. | 72 | |
| 2.28 | An opto-electronic wavelength converter. | 73 | |
| 2.29 | A wavelength converter based on nonlinear wave-mixing effects. | 74 | |
| 2.30 | A wavelength converter using co-propagation based on XGM in an SOA. | 76 | |
| 2.31 | An interferometric wavelength converter based on XPM in SOAs. | 76 | |
| 2.32 | Conversion using saturable absorption in a laser. | 77 | |
| 2.33 | A switch which has dedicated converters at each output port for each wavelength. | 79 | |
| 2.34 | Switches which allow sharing of converters. | 80 | |
| 2.35 | The share-with-local wavelength-convertible switch architecture. | 81 | |
| 2.36 | Architecture which supports electronic wavelength conversion. | 81 | |
| 2.37 | Broadcast-and-select WDM local optical network with a passive-star coupler network medium. | 86 | |
| 2.38 | Lightpath routing in a WDM WAN. | 90 | |
| 2.39 | MONET New Jersey Area Network. | 93 | |
| 2.40 | ONTC testbed. | 95 | |
| 2.41 | The AT&T/MIT-LL/DEC AON testbed architecture. | 96 | |
| 2.42 | Critical angle in a step index fiber. | 98 | |
| 2.43 | Critical angle in a graded index fiber. | 98 | |
| 2.44 | Two architectures for wavelength convertible routers: (a) share-per-node, (b) share-per-link. | 103 | |
| 2.45 | T=Transmitter, R=Receiver. All connections begin at transmitters and end at receivers | 105 | |
| 3.1 | A broadcast-and-select WDM network. | 110 | |
| 3.2 | Alternative physical topologies for a WDM local lightwave network. | 111 | |
| 3.3 | Architecture of the PAC optical packet network (the dashed lines are used to detect energy on the various channels from the ``main" star). | 124 | |
| 3.4 | The ALOHA/ALOHA protocol. | 125 | |
| 3.5 | Bimodal throughput characteristics of the slotted-ALOHA/ delayed-ALOHA protocol for L = 10 slots per data packet and N = number of data channels. | 127 | |
| 3.6 | Nonmonotonic delay characteristics of the slotted-ALOHA/ delayed-ALOHA protocol for L=10 slots per data packet, N=3 data channels, zero propagation delay, and different values of the backoff parameter K. | 128 | |
| 3.7 | The extended slotted-ALOHA protocols: (a) simple case, (b) higher concurrency to reduce channel wastage. Note: $\lambda_0$ is the control channel and $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, ... , \lambda_N$ are data channels. | 130 | |
| 3.8 | The dynamic time-wavelength division multiple access (DT-WDMA) protocol. | 135 | |
| 3.9 | The multichannel bus network: (a) network structure with tunable transmitters and fixed receivers, and (b) a cycle in AMTRAC for N=4 and M=4. | 140 | |
| 3.10 | Classification of single-hop network architectures. | 142 | |
| 4.1 | Passive-star topology for Rainbow. | 150 | |
| 4.2 | State diagram for the Rainbow model. | 154 | |
| 4.3 | Timing for connection setup. | 156 | |
| 4.4 | Throughput vs. arrival rate. Slot = 1 microsecond, N=32, R=50 microsecond, $\tau$ = 1 ms, $1/\rho$ = 100 ms. | 160 | |
| 4.5 | Throughput vs. message size. Slot = 1 microsecond, N=32, R=50 microsecond, $\tau$ = 1 ms, $\sigma = 0.0001 msg/slot, $\phi = 10$ ms. | 161 | |
| 4.6 | Throughput vs. timeout duration. Slot = 1 microsecond, N=32, R=50 microsecond, $\tau = 1$ ms, $1/\rho=100$ ms. | 161 | |
| 4.7 | Timeout probability vs. timeout duration. Slot = 1 microsecond, N=32, R=50 microsecond, $\tau = 1$ ms, $1/\rho=100$ ms. | 162 | |
| 4.8 | Throughput vs. timeout duration for different message lengths. Slot = 1 microsecond, N=32, R=50 microsecond, $\tau = 1$ ms, $\sigma = 0.0001 msg/slot. | 163 | |
| 4.9 | Delay vs. throughput with parameter $\phi $. Slot = 1 microsecond, N=32, R=50 microsecond, $\tau = 1$ ms, $\sigma = 0.0001 msg/slot, $1/\rho= 100$ ms. | 164 | |
| 4.10 | Delay vs. throughput with parameter $\sigma $. Slot = 1 microsecond, N=32, R=50 microsecond, $\tau = 1$ ms, $1/\rho= 100$ ms, $\phi = 10$ ms. | 165 | |
| 4.11 | Delay vs. throughput for varying message size. Slot = 1 microsecond, N=32, R=50 microsecond, $\tau = 1$ ms, $\sigma = 0.0001 msg/slot, $\phi = 10$ ms. | 165 | |
| 4.12 | Throughput vs. timeout duration for different number of stations. Slot = 1 microsecond, R=50 microsecond, $\tau = 1$ ms, $\sigma = 0.0001 msg/slot, $1/\rho= 100$ ms. | 166 | |
| 5.1 | An example four-node multihop network: (a) physical topology, (b) logical topology. | 172 | |
| 5.2 | A (2,2) ShuffleNet. | 177 | |
| 5.3 | A (2,3) de Bruijn graph. | 182 | |
| 5.4 | A 4 x 6 Manhattan Street Network (MSN) with unidirectional links. | 184 | |
| 5.5 | A (2,4) ShuffleNet. | 185 | |
| 5.6 | An eight-node binary hypercube. | 187 | |
| 5.7 | A linear dual-bus network. | 189 | |
| 5.8 | Classification of multihop network architectures. | 196 | |
| 5.9 | The (10-node) Peterson graph. | 199 | |
| 5.10 | A bidirectional ring network. | 199 | |
| 6.1 | A 10-node (2,5,2) GEMNET. | 205 | |
| 6.2 | Bounds and average hop distance for a P=2, 64-node GEMNET with different values of K. | 212 | |
| 6.3 | Growing a (1,6,2) GEMNET by one node. | 216 | |
| 7.1 | Delay behavior of a shared-channel, WDM, multihop network with changes in load $\lambda$ and number of available wavelengths w. | 221 | |
| 7.2 | Logical assignment of wavelengths in an eight-node network arranged as a ShuffleNet with K=2 and P=2: (a) nonshared case where w=2N=16; (b) shared case where w=8 < 2N. | 223 | |
| 7.3 | Twelve-node SC_GEMNETs, along with corresponding timing diagrams, for various values of w: (a) w=12; (b) w=6; (c) w=4; (d) w=3; and (e) w=2. (Note: unless otherwise shown, all links are directed from left to right.) | 228 | |
| 7.4 | A (3,2) complete Moore graph. | 233 | |
| 7.5 | Effects of sharing on multicasting in a (3,2) complete, Moore graph. The source node is node 1 and the destination nodes are nodes 2, 3, 6, and 7: (a) nonshared case; (b) shared-channel case. | 234 | |
| 7.6 | Various delay components vs. number of wavelengths in a 12-node network with R=2 and $\lambda$ = 0.05. | 239 | |
| 7.7 | Average delay vs. number of wavelengths in a 12-node network with R=2 and various load values. Marked points indicate values of admitting equal sharing of the available bandwidth among the 12 nodes when each node has a single transmitter-receiver pair. | 241 | |
| 7.8 | Upper (w_H) and lower (w_L) bounds on the number of channels admitting stability and optimal number of channels (w*) vs. the load in a 12-node network. Note that the curves for R=1 and R=0 are identical; therefore only one of them is shown. | 242 | |
| 7.9 | Average delay, T, vs. number of wavelengths, w, for various values of propagation delay in a 120-node network: (a) $\lambda$ = 0.001; (b) $\lambda$ = 0.005; (c) $\lambda$ = 0.01; (d) $\lambda$ = 0.05. | 244 | |
| 7.10 | Average delay, T, vs. number of wavelengths, w, for various values of load in a 120-node network: (a) R=0; (b) R=1; (c) R=10; (d) R=100. | 245 | |
| 7.11 | Upper (w_H) and lower (w_L) bounds on the number of channels admitting stability and optimal number of channels (w*) vs. load in a 120-node network. | 246 | |
| 7.12 | Delay vs. load for Systems A through F: (a) m=1; (b) m=5; (c) m=20; (d) m=36. | 251 | |
| 7.13 | Ratio of maximum throughput at a given m to the maximum throughput at m=1. | 252 | |
| 7.14 | A (2,2) complete Moore graph. | 255 | |
| 7.15 | A (4,2) incomplete Moore graph. | 255 | |
| 8.1 | NSFNET T1 backbone, 1991. ( \copyright Merit Network, Inc. ) | 262 | |
| 8.2 | Modified physical topology. | 266 | |
| 8.3 | A 16-node hypercube virtual topology embedded on the NSFNET physical topology. | 267 | |
| 8.4 | Details of the Utah (UT) node. | 268 | |
| 8.5 | The physical topology with embedded wavelengths corresponding to an optimal solution (more than one transceiver at any node can tune to the same wavelength). | 269 | |
| 8.6 | The physical topology with embedded wavelengths corresponding to an optimal solution (all transceiver pairs at any node must be tuned to different wavelengths). | 269 | |
| 8.7 | Delay vs. throughput (scaleup) characteristics with no WDM, i.e., physical topology as virtual topology. | 283 | |
| 8.8 | Delay vs. throughput (scaleup) characteristics with WDM used on some links, but no WRSs, i.e., multiple point-to-point links are allowed on the physical topology. | 284 | |
| 8.9 | Delay vs. throughput (scaleup) characteristics with full WDM on some links and a WRS at each node, i.e., arbitrary virtual topologies are allowed. | 284 | |
| 8.10 | Delay vs. throughput (scaleup) characteristics for different virtual topologies. | 285 | |
| 8.11 | Distributions of the number of wavelengths used in each of the 21 fiber links of the NSFNET for the virtual topology approach with nodal degree P = 4, 5, and 6. | 287 | |
| 9.1 | NSFNET T1 backbone. | 293 | |
| 9.2 | Optimal solution for a two-wavelength and a five-wavelength network. Each physical link consists of two unidirectional fibers carrying transmissions in opposite directions (hence, each wavelength may appear twice on any link in the diagrams; their signal propagation directions are opposite to each other in such cases). Wavelength 0 is used to embed the physical topology over the virtual topology, so the Wavelength-0 lightpaths are not shown explicitly in these diagrams to preserve clarity. Note: $\circ$ = transmitter; $\bullet$ = receiver. | 294 | |
| 9.3 | Transport node in the RACE WDM optical network architecture. | 306 | |
| 9.4 | Average packet hop distance for the optimal solution. | 311 | |
| 9.5 | Average transceiver utilization for the optimal solution. | 312 | |
| 9.6 | Average wavelength utilization for the optimal solution. | 312 | |
| 9.7 | Comparison of heuristic algorithms for a four-wavelength network. | 314 | |
| 9.8 | Reconfiguration statistics. | 316 | |
| 9.9 | Physical network topology. | 318 | |
| 9.10 | Physical network topology. | 319 | |
| 10.1 | Lightpath routing in an all-optical network. | 322 | |
| 10.2 | Effect of nodal degree d (for K=2 alternate paths) on wavelength routing. | 335 | |
| 10.3 | Effect of number of connections on link congestion. | 338 | |
| 10.4 | Connection requests. | 340 | |
| 11.1 | An all-optical wavelength-routed network. | 342 | |
| 11.2 | Wavelength-continuity constraint in a wavelength-routed network. | 343 | |
| 11.3 | Functionality of a wavelength converter. | 344 | |
| 11.4 | A switch which has dedicated converters at each output port for each wavelength. | 345 | |
| 11.5 | Switches which allow sharing of converters. | 346 | |
| 11.6 | Wavelength conversion for distributed network management. | 350 | |
| 11.7 | Blocking probabilities for different loads in a 10-node optical ring with sparse nodal conversion. | 358 | |
| 11.8 | NSFNET with the number of convertible routes shown. A number on a link indicates how many source-destination paths passed through the previous node and possibly could have been converted. A number next to a node indicates how many source-destination paths pass through the node and can possibly be wavelength converted. | 359 | |
| 11.9 | Blocking probabilities in the NSFNET for optimal and heuristic placement of wavelength converters (30 ERLANG load). | 360 | |
| 11.10 | Comparison of blocking probabilities in the NSFNET when using full conversion and no conversion in the network with the Best-Fit algorithm. | 362 | |
| 11.11 | Percent gain in the NSFNET from using full-conversion at every node as opposed to no conversion in the network. | 362 | |
| 11.12 | Distribution of the number of wavelength converters utilized at node 2 in the NSFNET (30 ERLANG load). | 363 | |
| 11.13 | Network with uniform loading. | 366 | |
| 12.1 | Implementation of the circuit-migration sequence. | 381 | |
| 12.2 | Network architecture for distributed control and management. | 382 | |
| 12.3 | The AT&T testbed architecture. | 388 | |
| 12.4 | The Bellcore all-optical network architecture. | 390 | |
| 12.5 | Transport node in the RACE architecture. | 392 | |
| 13.1 | The WDDI ring network. | 400 | |
| 13.2 | WDDI node and bridge interfaces. | 403 | |
| 13.3 | Delay versus N characteristics for two-server traffic (W=2). | 420 | |
| 13.4 | Delay versus N characteristics for clustered traffic, c=2, k=5 (W=2). | 422 | |
| 13.5 | Delay versus N characteristics for pseudo-random traffic (W=2). | 423 | |
| 13.6 | Delay versus throughput characteristics (W=2). | 424 | |
| 13.7 | Delay vs. throughput characteristics for multiple partitions for MIN-DIFF-based algorithms. | 426 | |
| 13.8 | Delay vs. number of partitions for MIN-DIFF-based algorithms. | 426 | |
| 13.9 | Delay vs. throughput characteristics for multiple partitions for MIN-CROSS-based algorithms. | 428 | |
| 13.10 | Delay vs. number of partitions for MIN-CROSS-based algorithms. | 428 | |
| 14.1 | EDFA gain curve. | 433 | |
| 14.2 | Wavelength routing using AOTF. | 434 | |
| 14.3 | Wavelength-routed network with $\Lambda_0$ cycles. | 436 | |
| 14.4 | An example five-station, five-switch subgraph of the NSFNET T3 backbone. This network is used for the example ``static'' analysis results. | 437 | |
| 14.5 | A (random) four-station, eight-switch network generated by Module 1. Note that this network contains $\Lambda_0$ cycles (as indicated by dashed and dotted lines) when all switches are in BAR state. | 438 | |
| 14.6 | Flow chart of modules. | 439 | |
| 14.7 | Network after elimination of $\Lambda_0$ cycles using Module 3. | 448 | |
| 14.8 | Network after establishing two connections -- heavy lines -- (from station 2 to station 4 and from station 4 to station 3) using Module 4. However, a new connection -- dashed heavy line -- (from station 3 to station 1) is causing a $\Lambda_k$ cycle -- dashed light line. | 448 | |
| 14.9 | Network after elimination of $\Lambda_k$ cycles using Module 5. | 449 | |
| 14.10 | Fraction of unblocked calls vs. M for the 5-station, 17-link network. | 452 | |
| 14.11 | Probability of resource blocking vs. M for the 5-station, 17-link network. | 452 | |
| 14.12 | Probability of crosstalk blocking vs. M for the 5-station, 17-link network. | 453 | |
| 14.13 | Fraction of unblocked calls vs. M for the 14-station, 56-link network. | 454 | |
| 14.14 | Probability of resource blocking vs. M for the 14-station, 56-link network. | 454 | |
| 14.15 | Probability of crosstalk blocking vs. M for the 14-station, 56-link network. | 455 | |
| 14.16 | Network for Problem 14.1. | 459 | |
| 14.17 | Network for Problems 14.2 and 14.3. | 460 | |
| 14.18 | Network for Problem 14.4. | 461 | |
| 15.1 | Example of a passive-star-based optical metropolitan-area network (slightly modified version of the one used in [LTGC94]). | 464 | |
| 15.2 | Example of a nonreflective star. | 465 | |
| 15.3 | Two examples of powers on three wavelengths passing through a fiber. | 467 | |
| 15.4 | Simple two-star network that needs no amplifiers to operate. | 468 | |
| 15.5 | Original amplifier gain model approximations used in previous studies [LTGC94]. | 470 | |
| 15.6 | More-accurate amplifier gain model used in this study. | 471 | |
| 15.7 | Mid-sized tree-based network needing no amplifiers to function. | 481 | |
| 15.8 | A possible MAN network. | 482 | |
| 15.9 | A scaled-up version of the MAN network in Fig. 15.8. | 485 | |
| 15.10 | A scaled-down version of the MAN network in Fig. 15.8. | 485 | |
| 15.11 | A sample switched network. | 487 | |
| 15.12 | A cascade of amplifiers along a link. | 489 | |
| 15.13 | Network for Problems 15.5 and 15.6. | 490 | |
| 15.14 | A portion of a network. | 491 | |
| 15.15 | A distribution network. | 492 | |
| 16.1 | A TDM link and multiplexer. | 495 | |
| 16.2 | Generation of the OTDM signal: packet compression. | 498 | |
| 16.3 | Evolution of a nonhyperbolic secant pulse in a fiber. | 502 | |
| 16.4 | Evolution of a hyperbolic secant pulse in a fiber. | 502 | |
| 16.5 | All-optical clock recovery system (BPF = band-pass filter, PC = polarization controller) [BCHK96]. | 503 | |
| 16.6 | The HLAN architecture. | 505 | |
| 16.7 | The staggering switch architecture. | 506 | |
| 16.8 | The CORD architecture. | 507 | |
| 16.9 | A pseudo-random sequence generator. | 511 | |
| 16.10 | A CDMA receiver. | 512 | |
| 16.11 | Original data streams and coded, transmitted streams. | 513 | |
| 16.12 | Combined signals on data channel. | 514 | |
| 16.13 | Decoded sequence consisting of original signal and pseudo-noise. | 515 | |
| 16.14 | Decoded sequence with varying number of overlapping signals. | 516 | |
| 16.15 | Implementation of a CDMA coder and decoder based on optical splitters and combiners. | 517 | |
| 16.16 | Optical time-spreading CDMA. | 519 | |
| 16.17 | CDMA codes. | 521 |
Back to:
``Optical Communication Networks'' Homepage
B. Mukherjee's Homepage